+- Conductive Labs Support Forum (https://conductivelabs.com/forum)
+-- Forum: The NDLR (https://conductivelabs.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Feature Requests (https://conductivelabs.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: Encoder sensitivity (/showthread.php?tid=54)
Encoder sensitivity - drGrov - 01-12-2019
I sometimes find it difficult to make fine adjustments to parameter values via the encoders. I seem to turn them just a little to far, or too fast and skip over the values that I'm trying to select. How about a global sensitivity / acceleration setting for the encoders so we can adjust the overall encoder "feel" to taste?
RE: Encoder sensitivity - Darryl - 01-16-2019
We have played with various sensitivity adjustments and I think where we ended up is tuning each parameter individually. We chose an incremental encoder with a high resolution so you would not have to turn multiple revolutions to get from end to end, but we probably could have used a lower res encoder as most parameters only go to MIDI lengths. I am sure we will revisit the sensitivity on the most touchy ones.
RE: Encoder sensitivity - funktree - 02-01-2019
(01-16-2019, 12:21 PM)Darryl Wrote: We have played with various sensitivity adjustments and I think where we ended up is tuning each parameter individually. We chose an incremental encoder with a high resolution so you would not have to turn multiple revolutions to get from end to end, but we probably could have used a lower res encoder as most parameters only go to MIDI lengths. I am sure we will revisit the sensitivity on the most touchy ones.
How about acceleration:
slow turning => less changes
faster turning => more change
... I found the key parameters very sensitive:
- Clock division
- Pattern selection
- Mod Destination
RE: Encoder sensitivity - Darryl - 02-02-2019
(02-01-2019, 08:13 AM)funktree Wrote:(01-16-2019, 12:21 PM)Darryl Wrote: We have played with various sensitivity adjustments and I think where we ended up is tuning each parameter individually. We chose an incremental encoder with a high resolution so you would not have to turn multiple revolutions to get from end to end, but we probably could have used a lower res encoder as most parameters only go to MIDI lengths. I am sure we will revisit the sensitivity on the most touchy ones.
How about acceleration:
slow turning => less changes
faster turning => more change
... I found the key parameters very sensitive:
- Clock division
- Pattern selection
- Mod Destination
Good list for us to start with. The acceleration idea is also good, I think we considered that but it didn't make the cut.